Skip to main content

A History of art, by H.B. Cotterill

A History of art, by H.B. Cotterill

PREFACE

THE scheme of this volume differs from that of its predecessor in so far as each Part deals with a single nation, whereas in the former volume the subject was divided not so much according to nations as to eras, such as the pre-Hellenic, Hellenic, Hellenistic, Roman, Early Christian, Byzantine, Romanesque, and Gothic.

The reason will be apparent if one remembers that in the first volume the time covered was more than four thousand years, and that during those forty centuries one people succeeded another as a great world-power, whereas the period here treated is only about four centuries, and by the beginning of this period the chief nations of Europe, although all more or less directly inheritors of the same Hellenic art, had begun to develop distinct characteristics, artistic as well as political.

It is true that during these four centuries several waves of influence, of which that of the Italian Renaissance was perhaps the most important, spread over the greater part of Europe; but they reached the various nations by no means simultaneously, and they gave rise in each to varieties of art more diverse than any that arose in the Hellenic, the Roman, the Byzantine, or even the Gothic era. It also seemed advisable to adopt in this volume a national classification in order to differentiate as distinctly as possible the multitudinous artists whom one is bound to mention far more multitudinous than are the ancient and medieval artists whose names have been handed down to us.

In this connexion I should perhaps ask my readers to remember that when I undertook to trace the course of art from its early beginnings down to modern days I felt obliged to select only a certain number of great and characteristic specimens of architecture, painting, and sculpture, and to relate the lives of their makers only so far as these help us to appreciate more fully their works. There are, of course, not a few works of art that under such conditions a writer might select without any danger of contradiction, but he must be prepared to find that some of his inclusions and omissions do not win universal approval.

Having found it impossible, in consequence of ill health, to complete this volume for publication within the time anticipated, I availed myself of the friendly and efficient aid of Mr Stewart Dick, one of the official lecturers at the National Gallery, London, who has supplied the text for Part VII and is responsible for the chapters on Oriental art with which the volume concludes. As we have worked quite independently it is possible that slight differences of opinion on points of minor importance may exist.

H. B. C.
Vevey,
December 1923

****

Popular posts from this blog

History of art, by Wilhelm Lübke

PREFACE. THE INCREASED INTEREST shown in works of sculpture and painting during the last twenty years may be perceived by various favourable symptoms. This interest is not merely shown by delight in beauty of form, but it is combined with that deeper attraction towards historical knowledge which pervades our time. After Kugler, in his 'Handbook to Art History,' had for the first time traversed the whole grand field of art, and represented it in distinct outline, and Schnaase, in his 'History of the Plastic Arts,' had profoundly investigated and cleverly displayed the connection of artistic creations with the innermost life of nations and epochs, the desire for acquaintance with this historical progress of the arts was· awakened in cultivated circles, 'and at the same time the conviction gained ground that the enjoyment of a work of art was materially increased by the understanding of its historical existence.

In the meanwhile, inquiry extended over all branches a…

Principles of Art History, by Heinrich Wölfflin

We have said that the development of perception is psychologically apparent- that is, systematic. But then how was art, as an independent entity such as this, able to merge with the course of the broader history of spirit? Now art, in the full sense of the word, is not actually something we have addressed in our deliberations. The decisive element, the material world, has not been touched upon, and this includes not only the question of the (morphological) forms in which an age builds but also how man perceives himself and how he confronts worldly things intellectually and emotionally. Thus the problem is reduced to whether our history of seeing can really be called a history in its own right. Clearly that is only the case to a limited extent. Their sensual and spiritual nature means that these internal processes have always been part of the more comprehensive general development of every period. They are not separate, nor do they proceed at will. Bound up as they are with material, …